How does FDR's approach to civil rights differ from that of Herbert Hoover?

Franklin D. Roosevelt's approach to civil rights marked a significant shift from the policies and attitudes of Herbert Hoover. FDR's focus on new rights and the concept of positive liberty played a crucial role in his New Deal programs, which aimed to address economic inequality and provide relief to marginalized groups during the Great Depression. He recognized that traditional civil rights were insufficient in addressing the widespread injustices faced by various populations, particularly African Americans and other minority groups. Instead, FDR sought to create opportunities for these groups through government intervention and support, which was a departure from Hoover's more conservative stance.

Hoover, on the other hand, primarily advocated for a limited role of government in economic matters and social change, adhering to a more traditional understanding of rights that did not necessarily encompass the proactive measures needed to uplift disadvantaged communities. He favored a model where economic recovery was achieved through individual effort and private initiative rather than government action, which ultimately limited his engagement with social issues.

In summary, Roosevelt's emphasis on new rights and the idea of positive liberty through government involvement contrasts starkly with Hoover's reluctance to expand the role of government in ensuring civil rights, making FDR's approach more progressive and responsive to the needs of the time.