Which of the following summarizes Sandel's view on legislating morality?

Prepare for the BYU American Heritage Test with our comprehensive study materials. Engage with multiple-choice questions, flashcards revealing insightful explanations and hints. Ensure your readiness for the test!

Sandel's view on legislating morality emphasizes the importance of considering natural duties and community interests. He argues that laws should reflect moral values that resonate with the community's shared beliefs and responsibilities. By prioritizing natural duties, which are fundamental ethical obligations individuals have, along with community interests that promote the common good, legislation can foster a more cohesive and just society.

This perspective aligns legislation with ethical principles that many members of the community can support, thus creating laws that not only govern behavior but also encourage a sense of moral responsibility among citizens. The emphasis on community interests suggests that a just society depends on laws that reflect the values of its members and promote social welfare, rather than merely enforcing individual preferences or moral standings.

The other options do not capture this holistic approach. Some suggest that legislating morality may be unnecessary or counterproductive, which overlooks the potential positive role that laws can play in shaping moral norms. Others may imply that morality in legislation can exist without a shared consensus or focus solely on voluntary obligations, diminishing the role of community-driven ethics in lawmaking. Sandel recognizes that morality should not just be subjective or optional but must be integrated into the legal framework to enhance societal well-being.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy