Which plan is noted as being similar to the Articles of Confederation?

The New Jersey Plan is recognized as being similar to the Articles of Confederation because it emphasized maintaining the general structure of the Confederation while proposing some changes to improve its effectiveness. Both frameworks aimed for a strong state-level authority, which was a core characteristic of the Articles. The New Jersey Plan called for a unicameral legislature with equal representation for each state, mirroring the Articles’ principal of favoring state sovereignty over federal power. This focus on equality among states and a limited national government reflects the concerns that led to the formation of the Articles, seeking to balance power without concentrating too much in a central authority.

In contrast, the other plans, like the Virginia Plan, proposed a stronger national government with representation based on population, thereby suggesting a significant departure from the Articles' structure. The Connecticut Compromise sought to meld these ideas but was built upon the disagreements highlighted by the Virginia and New Jersey Plans. The Proportional Representation Plan aligns more closely with the Virginia Plan, advocating for representation based on population and further moving away from the principles of the Articles.