Who disagrees with Sandel's positions on market ethics?

Brennan and Jaworski are prominent figures in the discussion of market ethics and they actively challenge Michael Sandel's views on the morality of markets. Sandel argues against the commodification of certain goods and services, asserting that some things should not be treated as market commodities due to ethical implications. In contrast, Brennan and Jaworski defend a more libertarian view that supports the idea of markets as a mechanism for human interaction and exchange, emphasizing that voluntary transactions are generally ethical and beneficial.

Their stance involves advocating for the belief that markets can lead to positive outcomes and that individuals have the right to engage in trade without moral constraints, provided the transactions are consensual. This opposition highlights a fundamental debate in contemporary political philosophy regarding the role of ethics in market transactions and the extent to which moral considerations should influence economic behavior.

Other figures listed may have their own perspectives, but it is Brennan and Jaworski who are recognized for their clear disagreement with Sandel’s positions specifically within the realm of market ethics.